Skip to content

An view of event driven solutions With GenAI

Details of this picture follow the picture

The following text was provided by Google Gemini 2.0. The pictures were drawn by Gary Zeien. The output was reviewed.

Please provide an explanation of this picture that includes details on the key objects in the picture, the relationships, and a summary of the key points being covered in this picture.

This diagram illustrates an enhanced event-driven architecture that incorporates Retrieval Augmented Generation (RAG), Large Language Models (LLMs), and Open Policy Agent (OPA) for more intelligent and policy-driven event processing. Here's a breakdown:

Key Objects:

  • Event Provider: The source of business events. It publishes events onto the Event Bus.
  • Event: A record of something that has happened in the system. Each event has a type and a standardized format (JSON in this case).
  • Event Bus Service: A message broker (e.g., Kafka, RabbitMQ) that facilitates asynchronous communication between different parts of the system. Events are published to specific "Topics."
  • Actions Service: A service responsible for executing actions based on processed events. It's dynamically scalable.
  • Action Implementation Services: Individual services that perform the actual tasks associated with specific actions.
  • Supporting Service (Data Enrichment): A service that can enrich events with additional data before they are processed.
  • Analytics/ML/AI Service: A service that analyzes events and can feed insights back into the system as "Super Events."
  • Data Lake: A centralized repository for storing raw event data for analysis.
  • Policy Mgmt Service: Manages business policies, authorization policies, SLAs, audit policies, etc.
  • Open Policy Agent (OPA) Engine: Enforces policies defined in Rego language.
  • Policy Repository: Stores the policy definitions.
  • Audit Service: Logs all actions taken and provides an audit trail.
  • Cloud Data/Context: Represents external data sources or context that can be retrieved using RAG.
  • LLM (Large Language Model): Processes enriched events and generates suggested actions and explanations.
  • Prompt: Instructions given to the LLM to guide its processing.

Relationships and Workflow:

  1. Event Origination: The Event Provider publishes an Event to a specific Topic on the Event Bus.
  2. Event Subscription: The Actions Service subscribes to relevant Topics on the Event Bus.
  3. Event Enrichment (Optional): The Supporting Service can optionally enrich the event with additional data.
  4. RAG (Retrieval Augmented Generation):
    • The system retrieves additional context related to the event from external data sources (Cloud Data/Context) using the event data as a query.
    • This retrieved context is combined with the original event to create an "Enriched Event."
  5. LLM Processing:
    • A "Prompt" is created, instructing the LLM on how to process the Enriched Event.
    • The LLM processes the Enriched Event based on the Prompt and generates suggested "Generated Actions" and an "Explanation" for those actions.
  6. Policy Enforcement (OPA):
    • The original Event and the Generated Actions are passed to the OPA Engine.
    • OPA evaluates the actions against policies stored in the Policy Repository.
    • OPA enforces the policies, potentially modifying or rejecting actions.
  7. Action Execution: The Actions Service executes the approved actions using appropriate Action Implementation Services.
  8. Auditing: The Audit Service logs all events, actions, and policy decisions.
  9. Analytics and Learning: The Analytics/ML/AI Service analyzes events stored in the Data Lake and can generate "Super Events" that are fed back into the system, enabling continuous learning and improvement.

Key Points:

  • Enhancing Event Processing with AI: The core idea is to leverage LLMs to make event processing more intelligent and context-aware.
  • RAG for Contextual Awareness: RAG is used to provide the LLM with relevant context, improving the quality of its suggestions.
  • OPA for Policy Enforcement: OPA ensures that all actions taken are compliant with business policies, providing a crucial safety net and auditability.
  • Clear Separation of Concerns: The diagram shows a clear separation of concerns between event generation, event processing, policy enforcement, and action execution.
  • Scalability and Flexibility: The architecture is designed to be scalable and flexible, allowing for the addition of new event types, actions, and policies.
  • Continuous Learning: The feedback loop through the Analytics/ML/AI Service enables the system to learn and improve over time.

In essence, this diagram presents a sophisticated event-driven architecture that combines the power of AI with robust policy enforcement to create a more intelligent, adaptable, and compliant system.

Editors comment:

OK. This is an example of how I used a prompt to GenAI to help envision a solution. THEN I updated the original architecture picture and ran it back throught "the system".

Prompt:_ "I have an event driven architecture where I leverage OPA based policies to examine the business events and determine the course of action that should be taken. How can I leverage RAG and LLMs to enhance and streamline the processing of business events while ensuring that by business policies are used in the actions to take."

Response:

You're looking to combine the strengths of OPA (Open Policy Agent) for policy enforcement with the power of LLMs (Large Language Models) and RAG (Retrieval Augmented Generation) to enhance your event-driven architecture. This is a powerful combination. Here's a breakdown of how you can achieve this:

Understanding the Current Setup:

You have business events flowing through your system. OPA policies evaluate these events and decide which actions to take. This provides strong control and compliance.

Enhancements with RAG and LLMs:

  1. Enriching Events with Context (RAG):

    • External Knowledge Base: Create a knowledge base containing relevant business information, documentation, FAQs, past event history, and other contextual data. This could be a vector database (like Pinecone, Weaviate), a document store, or even a simple file system.
    • Retrieval: When an event arrives, use the event data as a query to retrieve relevant information from the knowledge base. This is the "Retrieval" part of RAG.
    • Augmentation: Combine the retrieved context with the original event data. This augmented event now contains more information for the LLM and OPA to work with.

  2. Generating Actionable Insights (LLM):

    • LLM Prompting: Use the augmented event as input to an LLM. Craft prompts that instruct the LLM to:
      • Summarize the event and its context.
      • Identify potential issues or opportunities.
      • Suggest possible actions based on the event and context.
      • Explain the reasoning behind the suggested actions.
    • Example Prompt: "Event: Customer placed a large order for a discontinued product. Context: This product was discontinued due to low demand but has recently seen a surge in interest on social media. Suggest appropriate actions and explain your reasoning."

  3. Policy Enforcement with OPA:

    • OPA as the Guardrail: Instead of relying solely on the LLM to determine actions, use OPA to enforce your business policies.
    • Input to OPA: Provide both the original event and the LLM's suggested actions as input to OPA.
    • Policy Evaluation: OPA policies can then:
      • Validate that the LLM's suggested actions are compliant with business rules.
      • Modify or reject actions if they violate any policies.
      • Add additional actions required by policy (e.g., logging, auditing).

Workflow:

  1. Event Arrives: A business event enters the system.
  2. Context Retrieval (RAG): Relevant information is retrieved from the knowledge base based on the event.
  3. Event Augmentation: The event is enriched with the retrieved context.
  4. LLM Processing: The augmented event is passed to an LLM with a carefully crafted prompt.
  5. Action Suggestion: The LLM generates suggested actions and explanations.
  6. Policy Enforcement (OPA): OPA evaluates the suggested actions against predefined policies.
  7. Action Execution: Approved actions are executed.

Benefits:

  • Improved Decision-Making: LLMs can provide more nuanced and context-aware recommendations than simple rule-based systems.
  • Automation of Complex Tasks: LLMs can automate tasks that previously required human intervention.
  • Enhanced Auditability: OPA provides a clear audit trail of policy enforcement.
  • Flexibility and Adaptability: The system can adapt to changing business requirements by updating the knowledge base, LLM prompts, or OPA policies.

Key Considerations:

  • Prompt Engineering: Careful prompt engineering is crucial for getting the desired output from the LLM.
  • Knowledge Base Maintenance: Keeping the knowledge base up-to-date is essential for accurate context retrieval.
  • OPA Policy Design: Well-defined OPA policies are necessary for ensuring compliance.
  • LLM Hallucinations: LLMs can sometimes generate incorrect or nonsensical outputs. OPA acts as a critical safeguard against this.
  • Latency: Adding RAG and LLM processing can introduce latency. Consider performance requirements.

By combining RAG, LLMs, and OPA, you can create a more intelligent, adaptable, and compliant event-driven architecture that can handle complex business scenarios more effectively.

Last update: January 29, 2025
Back to top